AD2000 - a journal of religious opinionAD Books
Ask a Question
View Cart
Search AD2000: author: full text:  
AD2000 - a journal of religious opinion
Find a Book:

AD2000 Home
Article Index
About AD2000
Contact Us
Email Updates


Add Me
Remove Me

Subscriber Access:

Enter the Internet Access Key from your mailing label here for full access!


For what should the Church apologise?

Bookmark and Share

 Contents - Apr 2000AD2000 April 2000 - Buy a copy now
Editorial: For what should the Church apologise? - Michael Gilchrist
Should the Church apologise? - Fr Colin Barker
News: The Church Around the World
John Paul II calls for recovery of the true spirit of Vatican II - AD2000 Report
Impressive gathering of young people attend TMC Summer School - Michael Daniel
Eichmann's diary reveals Catholic Church's assistance to Jews - Zenit News Service
Fraternity of St Peter in Melbourne Archdiocese - Michael Daniel
Father Winfried's progress report from Tanzania - Fr Winfried Ngonyani
Indulgences and the Millennium Jubilee Year - Neil Coup
Symposium on the Holy Shroud - Zenit News Service
Coming Home Network: a Catholic apostolate for converts - Marcus Grodi
Reflection: The message of the Resurrection teaches nothing is impossible for God - Fr Ronald Rolheiser

The recently released Vatican document, titled Memory and Reconciliation: The Church and the Faults of the Past, represents the long-awaited "apology" from the Catholic Church. It is described as for "consultation," indicating it does not carry the weight of magisterial documents on faith and morals.

Whatever one's opinion on the merits of making "apologies" for other people's past actions, Memory and Reconciliation is at pains to offer a balanced view of the Church's "apology". For example, contemporary judgments should not be made on the basis of popular misconceptions about certain historical errors, since these conceptions are frequently "false and unacceptable." One might cite the Galileo case, the Inquisition and the Crusades as complex occurrences often oversimplified according to 20th or 21st century standards.

The "Statement of Repentance to mark the 2000th Anniversary of the Birth of Jesus Christ" released on 7 March by Cardinal Clancy on behalf of the Australian Bishops Conference, was the local response to this Vatican document. It contains items meriting "repentance" no-one would argue with, e.g., the poor handling of sexual abuse cases.

However, some Catholics may see the list of "faults" as selective and over-generalised, and even smacking of political correctness, e.g., "Our efforts to assist indigenous Australians have often been misguided ..." or "The Church has not been sufficiently alert to the needs of particular groups, such as women, youth and migrants."

It could reasonably be argued that the Church in Australia, more often than not, has been in the forefront of progress in these and other areas. Some might even consider the Church's lack of early alertness and action in the face of threats to unborn Australians or neglect of sound religious education in her schools as fitter subjects for "apologies".

Michael Gilchrist: Editor (E-mail -

Bookmark and Share

Reprinted from AD2000 Vol 13 No 3 (April 2000), p. 2

Page design and automation by
Umbria Associates Pty Ltd © 2001-2004