AD2000 - a journal of religious opinionAD Books
Ask a Question
View Cart
Search AD2000: author: full text:  
AD2000 - a journal of religious opinion
Find a Book:

AD2000 Home
Article Index
About AD2000
Contact Us
Email Updates


Add Me
Remove Me

Subscriber Access:

Enter the Internet Access Key from your mailing label here for full access!


Christian unity: major obstacles still remain

Bookmark and Share

 Contents - Apr 2003AD2000 April 2003 - Buy a copy now
Editorial: Good news on the liturgy - Peter Westmore
Dr Claudio Betti's inspiring visit to Australia - Peter Westmore
News: The Church Around the World
Documents: Church must be outspoken on moral issues: Australian Senator - Senator John Hogg
Documents: Archbishop Hickey on Catholics in politics - Archbishop Barry Hickey
Archbishop Hickey's pastoral letter on marriage - Archbishop Barry Hickey
Ecumenism: Christian unity: major obstacles still remain - David Schutz
Film Review: Why 'Gangs of New York' misses the boat as history - William J. Stern
Education: Chavagnes International Catholic college update - Br John Moylan
Our Lady of Peace: one American parish's successful formula - Arthur J. Brew
Letters: Authentic teaching (letter) - Aaron Wright
Letters: Vatican II (letter) - Denis O'Leary
Letters: Shooting the messenger - Alan Gill
Letters: Experiential catechesis (letter) - Fr. G.H. Duggan SM
Priestly Fraternity of St Peter - Holy Week 2003
Letters: Infallible? (letter) - Fr John Crothers PP
Letters: Life Walk (letter) - Brian Harris
Letters: Priorities (letter) - Jeanette Joseph
Letters: Stem cell research (letter) - W. Kline
Letters: Catholic hospitals? (letter) - Tom King
Letters: TV report (letter) - Kevin J. Kerr
Letters: Novena (letter) - Robert Anderson
Books: Newman, by Avery Dulles SJ - Peter Westmore (reviewer)
Books: The First Grace, by Russell Hittinger - Peter Westmore (reviewer)
Books: Marian Apparitions, The Bible, And The Modern World - Michael Gilchrist (reviewer)
Books: A Seat At The Supper, by Frank Colyer - Mark Posa (reviewer)
Books: A Long Way From Rome, edited by Chris McGillion - John Barich (reviewer)
Books: Our books are the cheapest!
Reflection: The road to Emmaus: coming to terms with the hard reality of loss - Fr Dennis Byrnes PP

In a report in the 'AD2000' Christmas edition (page 10), a prominent US Catholic academic, Robert George responded to Methodist theologian Thomas Oden's paper "The new ecumenism and Christian witness to society" at a gathering of the Institute on Religion and Democracy in Washington, DC, saying: "As a Catholic panelist, I suppose that I am expected to say something critical, [but] I'm afraid I must disappoint this expectation."

Perhaps this is because Dr Oden's paper included so much good sense, that most people, on reading it for the first time, would react positively.

However, David Schutz, Executive Officer, Ecumenical and Interfaith Commission of the Catholic Archdiocese of Melbourne, considers that, given time for further reflection, faithful ecumenically-minded Catholics would have questions to raise about Oden's vision of the "new ecumenism".

The Church Times recently reported that the Anglican Archbishop of Sydney, Dr Peter Jensen, told conservative evangelicals in London": "Evangelicals must stand shoulder to shoulder, doing evangelism with those churches and denominations with whom they could co-operate 'in gospel unity'." This definition, said Dr Jensen, excluded, for him personally, the Roman Catholics. He had "serious misgivings about what sacramentalist ministry does for the clarity of the gospel."

Dr Jensen is not alone in this opinion. Evangelicals have not, on the whole, been well represented in ecumenical circles. Like Pentecostals, they have maintained their distance. But Dr Thomas Oden identifies liberal Protestantism, not Catholicism, as the real ecumenical enemy. He sets himself apart from those evangelicals who would see any close co-operation with Catholics and Orthodox as an impossibility.

Many evangelicals (even Dr Jensen!) are discovering common ground with Catholic and Orthodox Christians in the area of morality and ethics. Groups such as "Evangelicals and Catholics Together", in which Richard John Neuhaus is a leading Catholic participant, are also discovering a shared interest in issues such as the authority of Scripture, the historical veracity of the virgin birth and the resurrection, and the orthodox Trinitarian and Christological doctrines.

Oden believes that the "substance of historic Christian orthodoxy" can be found in the common patristic heritage of the first millennium which is shared by Evangelicals, Pentecostals, Catholics and Orthodox alike. As one reviewer expressed it, he believes in "a core, unchanging tradition that the worldwide Church had consensus on, especially in the doctrine-delimiting creeds and councils."

Oden calls the movement toward unity that conservative Christians are experiencing on the basis of this ancient agreement the "new ecumenism". In his original paper Oden illustrated the opposing approaches to the ecumenical endeavour in a series of contrasting positions.

"Old" ecumenism "accommodates modernity uncritically", is "oriented mainly to enlightenment assumptions and the Reformation's left wing", is "chronically activist", and ultimately "politically driven." "New" ecumenism, on the other hand, is "critical of failed modern ideas", "oriented mainly to classic Christianity", "patient amid historical turbulence", and "spirit-led".

Some of Oden's new ecumenism emphasis is clearly in line with Catholic teaching, but other emphases require further examination.

For instance, Catholics affirm that the Church's hierarchical structure is essential to its nature. Oden rejects what he calls "top heavy administration". He opposes bureaucracy and hierarchy in favour of a more democratic web-networking approach - a "world-wide-web" model of church co-operation. Oden sees hope neither in the bureaucratic hierarchy embodied in the Geneva-based "conciliar model" of ecumenism, nor in the hierarchical college of bishops in union with the Bishop of Rome.

But for Catholics, the latter remains essential. As the encyclical Ut unum sint makes clear, even if the role of the pope were to be rethought, the Catholic ecumenical vision will always include the papacy.

Institutional unity

We see the same suspicion of institutional unity when Oden contrasts a unity negotiated between institutions ("old ecumenism") with a unity based on classic Christian truth ("new ecumenism"). The "new ecumenism", he says later in his paper, is not about "an organisational expression of institutional union".

In fact, the new ecumenism hasn't clearly decided what form the unity of the Church should take in the new post-World Council of Churches ecumenism, or whether to not focus on the institutional manifestation of organic unity in any way at all.

Such a vagueness with regard to visible unity is possible for Oden because, as an evangelical Protestant, he defines the Church as an invisible entity "constituted by all who repent and believe, whose lives are shaped by their participation in the living Christ, all who live in this real but imperfect communion."

Like many Catholics, Evangelicals are not generally in favour of the "unity in diversity model" of ecumenism. They believe that a high degree of doctrinal conformity is necessary for church communion. However, unlike Catholics, Evangelicals generally believe that this doctrinal conformity creates unity. If party A teaches the same as party B, Evangelicals would regard them as "one" even if there is no institutional expression of that relationship (such as the mutual submission of both parties to a common pastor or college of pastors).

Catholics cannot settle for anything less than the visible unity of the Body of Christ as their ecumenical goal. John Paul II has written: "The greater mutual understanding and the doctrinal convergences already achieved between us, which have resulted in an affective and effective growth of communion, cannot suffice for the conscience of Christians who profess that the Church is one, holy, catholic and apostolic. The ultimate goal of the ecumenical movement is to re-establish full visible unity among all the baptised" (Ut unum sint, no. 77).

The Holy Father's reference to baptism here as the basis of unity is a reminder that Catholics envisage church unity as a sacramental unity, that is, a unity based in a common baptism, sharing common sacraments, ministered to by a common priesthood.

Evangelicals, on the other hand, tend to see the basis of unity in the Word of God, correctly preached and taught. Hence, the classic antithesis characteristic of the two types of Western Christianity - Catholic and Protestant - are here expressed also in the ecumenical hopes of both groups.

There is, certainly, and happily, some convergence on both sides. Catholics have learned to appreciate the importance of a theology of the Word in ecclesiology, and Protestants have shown a greater appreciation for sacramental and liturgical theology - but this later development has not been so well marked in evangelical Protestants as amongst their more liberal counterparts.

Hence the continued downplaying of sacramental unity in the evangelical vision of church unity. Dr Jensen's words cited above serve as a reminder of this.

It is worth pausing for a moment and asking how Evangelicals define themselves. What separates them from their brothers and sisters in Protestantism?

In one of the earliest examinations of the question of the ecumenical relationship between Catholics and Evangelicals, J.W. Montgomery, an American evangelical Lutheran, defined evangelicalism as characterised by the following traits:

* Conviction that the Bible alone is God's objectively inerrant revelation to man.

* Subscription to the Ecumenical Creeds as expressing the Trinitarian heart of biblical religion.

* Belief that the Reformation confessions adequately convey the soteriological essence of the scriptural message, namely, salvation by grace alone through faith in the atoning death and resurrection of the God-man Jesus Christ.

* Stress upon personal, dynamic, living commitment to Christ and resultant prophetic witness for him to the unbelieving world.

* A strong eschatological perspective.

The problem is immediately evident here. Catholicism affirms the first conviction (with the significant removal of the word "alone"). It also affirms the second conviction. The last two convictions certainly are not antithetical to authentic Catholic faith.

But when it comes to the third conviction, evangelicals still view the Catholic Church with great suspicion - despite the fact that the Catholic Church clearly teaches "salvation by grace alone through faith in Christ" - and Catholics would not regard the Reformation confessions as "adequate" in any sense. There are therefore points of meeting between Catholic and Evangelical Christianity, but there are tensions, and the tensions are real.

One of the few cases in which Oden grudgingly acknowledges the fruitfulness of the dialogical method of ecumenism ("old ecumenism") is with regard to the Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification with the Lutheran churches.

Again and again since 1999, John Paul II has referred to the Declaration as a most significant moment for the coming together of Evangelicals and Catholics. But for all this new agreement, in Ut unum sint (79) the Holy Father identified five areas which require further dialogue:

* The relationship between Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition.

* The Eucharist as the sacrament of the Body and Blood of Christ, an offering of praise to the Father, the sacrificial memorial and real presence of Christ and the sanctifying outpouring of the Holy Spirit.

* Ordination as a sacrament and the threefold ministry of episcopate, presbyterate and diaconate.

* The Magisterium of the Church, entrusted to the Pope and the bishops in communion with him.

* The Virgin Mary as Mother of God and the Icon of the Church, and the spiritual mother who intercedes for Christ's disciples and for all humanity.

These are precisely the doctrines with which Dr Jensen, Dr Oden and other evangelicals are certain to find the greatest difficulty. Furthermore, we should note that although these teachings received significant development during the second Christian millennium, they are all clearly rooted in the first millennium - exactly the period Oden identifies as the basis for the "new ecumenism".

One cannot help feeling that this optimistic belief in the "ancient ecumenism" of the first millennium is, in the final analysis, the real weakness of Oden's ecumenical hope. The na•ve assumption that because the Church was (relatively) united during that period, it must be able to form a basis for doctrinal consensus today is flawed.

Classic Christianity

The idea that there is a shared ecumenism between Catholics, Evangelicals and Orthodox "oriented mainly to classic Christianity, conciliar and patristic teaching" and finding its "apogee in seven Ecumenical Councils", is reminiscent of C.S. Lewis' notion that there was something we could call "mere Christianity", separate from different denominational confessions.

In fact, the "consensus of the first millennium" was precisely that - a consensus of the past. Apart from the Chalcedonian split in the fifth century (one which Oden correctly notes as being on the way toward reconciliation), all the continuing divisions of the Church have originated in the second millennium.

It would be nice to return to the "unity" of the first millennium, but theology moves forward, not backward. The doctrines proclaimed by the last 14 ecumenical councils cannot be swept away in favour of the first seven. Yes, there is very much that Evangelicals and Catholics and other Christians share in common, but the differences are significant and continue to stand in the way of visible unity.

If a "new ecumenism" is to be found, then a new consensus must be sought, and this will only be found at the table of negotiation and dialogue - the very table that Oden had hoped to leave behind with the outdated model of "old ecumenism".

The full text of Dr Oden's paper, "The new ecumenism and Christian witness to society", may be found at home.cfm?ID=214&c=28

Dr George's response can be read on the same website at .

Bookmark and Share

Reprinted from AD2000 Vol 16 No 3 (April 2003), p. 8

Page design and automation by
Umbria Associates Pty Ltd © 2001-2004