AD2000 - a journal of religious opinionAD Books
Ask a Question
View Cart
Search AD2000: author: full text:  
AD2000 - a journal of religious opinion
Find a Book:

AD2000 Home
Article Index
About AD2000
Contact Us
Email Updates


Add Me
Remove Me

Subscriber Access:

Enter the Internet Access Key from your mailing label here for full access!


Protecting marriage

Bookmark and Share

 Contents - May 2012AD2000 May 2012 - Buy a copy now
Mexico: Benedict XVI's reflection on Our Lady of Guadalupe - Pope Benedict XVI
Episcopacy: Brisbane's new Archbishop well-equipped for the challenges - Michael Gilchrist
News: The Church Around the World
Obama imposes contraception document on UN - Babette Francis
Benedict XVI builds on John Paul II's historic Cuba visit - Michael Gilchrist
The culture wars: Archbishop Chaput's call to Christians - Ben Johnson
Young adult ministry 2012: more reasons for hope - Br Barry Coldrey
Religious Freedom: Catholics in Iraq: a struggle for survival - Archbishop Bashar Matti Warda
The Church's dogma of transubstantiation - John Young
UK Catholic schools under fire for 'homophobia' - Hilary White
Letters: Obvious Link - C.V. Phillips
Letters: Pro-life apathy - George Simpson
Letters: Rights of children - Robert Bom
Letters: Protecting marriage - Brian A. Coman
Letters: Tradition - Peter Hill
Letters: Year of Grace - Ken Bayliss
Letters: Genuflection - John Frey
Letters: Education costs - Arnold Jago
Letters: Infanticide - Richard Congram
Letters: Endorsement - Joy Mason
Books: THE GIFT OF INFALLIBILITY, by Bishop Vincent Ferrer Gasser - Michael Daniel (reviewer)
Books: A COMPANION TO CATHOLIC EDUCATION, by Leonardo Franchi and Stephen McKinney (ed) - Angela Schumann (reviewer)
Events: The Ordinary Form of the Roman Rite: Sacredness in Continuity
Books: Order books from
Reflection: Nicene Creed's "consubstantial":What does this mean? - Bishop Arthur Serratelli

The Australian people have a perfect right, in fact a duty, to protect the institution of  marriage from those who seek to damage it in their own selfish interests.

Supporters of same sex "marriages" make lots of noise about gaining equal status in the eyes of the law but very little, if anything, about the detrimental impact such a move would have on marriage as we know it. The simple fact is that if you mix two things together both of them are changed not just one.

The impact upon traditional marriage would be disastrous. What, for example, would the  Commonwealth Marriage Act have to say to accommodate same sex couples? For various reasons it could not, I suggest, be couched in terms that would allow marriage celebrants and other authorities to rely simply upon the statement of an individual applicant as to his or her sexual preference as the sole determinant for eligibility under the Act.

For one thing such a course may well run up against some or other privacy provision. For another, Australians just do not like governments putting labels on them.

Inevitably, therefore, the door would have to be thrown open for anyone to "marry" anyone else to the ultimate detriment, even destruction, of traditional marriage as we know it.

What is more, the anti-discrimination arguments largely used to justify the damage are spurious at best if not patently false. The Commonwealth Marriage Act, for example, draws no distinction whatever between homosexuals and heterosexuals and thus could not possibly favour one or the other.

Even if the bow is stretched to the limit there is still no discrimination because a heterosexual is restricted by the Act in exactly the same way as a homosexual.

In confining itself to a union between a man and a woman the Marriage Act accords with  the natural order, is both legitimate and reasonable, and cannot, in my view, be regarded as in any way discriminatory against same sex unions. The two arrangements are simply different just as apples and oranges are different. The fruiterer does no wrong in treating one differently from the other.

So please let us have no more conjured up accusations of unfair discrimination. The  drawing of a distinction between the two life styles is quite unremarkable and sensible.

 Mordialloc, Vic

Bookmark and Share

Reprinted from AD2000 Vol 25 No 4 (May 2012), p. 15

Page design and automation by
Umbria Associates Pty Ltd © 2001-2004